User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemRazer Razer Blade R2
MotherboardGigabyte Blade
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121019
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 20 '18 at 12:23
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 159
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 372
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Gigabyte(1458 6745) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Lighting 9.67
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 11.2
8% 9.95 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 13.1
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2OA420 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 79.5
Write 111
Mixed 103
74% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.19
61% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback