Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory30.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '18 at 10:16
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 926
90% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,149
71% 1,149 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 190
Parallax 174
146% 181 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 177
Splatting 129
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 416
Mixed 414
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 46.4
169% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 130
143% 244 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0911
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 111
Mixed 84.9
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 4.28
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.4
324% 3.39 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
580GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 148
Mixed 148
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.33
101% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
376GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 129
Write 162
Mixed 126
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 5.36
4K Mixed 0.79
208% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
315GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 157
Mixed 161
132% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.31
88% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
279GB free
Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 83.7
Mixed 79
64% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.42
91% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 65%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
363GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 89.4
Write 84.3
Mixed 76.9
63% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.26
88% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.4
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,246
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback