PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T7500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 06FW8P |
Memory | 6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1768 x 992 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130206 |
Uptime | 7.3 Days |
Run Date | Apr 19 '18 at 22:09 |
Run Duration | 186 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5667
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
63.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
5.26%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
69GB free
Firmware: 0000
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate ST9200827AS 200GB
143GB free
Firmware: A
|
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
51.4%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 163x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 88x |
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples | 74x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 61x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 54x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |