Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3635QM 2,986 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 65.2 1-Core 86.1 2-Core 178 61% 110 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 434 50% 388 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0E6) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 1.38 2% 2 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 3.39 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7154 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4551 (B1) Unknown 95 95 58 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 47 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 57 (F1) Unknown 99 99 55924337389
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 10GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 139 Write 55 Mixed 63.3 94% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.55 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.57 68% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 37%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 134 Write 109 Mixed 112 148% 118 MB/s	4K Read 4.37 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 1.12 106% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.3% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 7.4 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-3635QMIntelBench 62%, 2,986 samples	88x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	86x
Radeon R9 M200XAMDBench 10%, 678 samples	4x
Radeon HD 8600/8700MAMDBench 6%, 1,000 samples	2x

SSD
535 Series 480GBIntel $180Bench 59%, 3,042 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 14,954 samples	27x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x8GBElpidaBench 30%, 109 samples	6x
CMSX8GX3M1A1600C10 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16GBUnknownBench 44%, 26 samples	5x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $180

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16