Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170616
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '18 at 12:52
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 71.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 224 75% 136 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 705 70% 571 Pts	64-Core 894 55% 894 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% XFX(1682 2451) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Lighting 4.03 Reflection 6.08 Parallax 2.94 3% 4.35 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 4.83 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 2,034 Write 1,170 Mixed 1,129 318% 1,444 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 24.9 146% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 95.1 90% 141 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 236%
WD WD7500AYPS-01ZKB0 750GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 607GB free Firmware: 02.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 183 5666 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 365 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4001 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 231 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 94 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2132 (C2) HDA temperature 110 98 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	43.8% Average	Read 77.6 Write 74.7 Mixed 74.5 57% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.28 98% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 43%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 371GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 140 3983 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 17 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 230 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 17 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 59 56 724041769 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 7 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	67.6% Good	Read 118 Write 118 Mixed 116 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.35 106% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.2% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 26.1 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 21 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 97.5 41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)