Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UP4  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '18 at 06:27
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 825
83% 672 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1540 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 52.6
Parallax 56.5
37% 51.5 fps
MRender 52.8
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 37.8
35% 43.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 494
Write 483
Mixed 479
108% 485 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 16.9
93% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 15.8
21% 36 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
440GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 98.8
Write 76.4
Mixed 65.4
98% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.22
58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 53.3
MC Mixed 52
154% 53.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 48.9
82% 48.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 136%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UP4 Builds (Compare 890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - $480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $802
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback