Asus G53JW

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus G53JW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G53JW
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '18 at 03:23
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 94.5 1-Core 64.8 2-Core 92 57% 83.8 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 231 25% 197 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2040) 1.5GB CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	7.25% Terrible	Lighting 8.2 Reflection 9.73 Parallax 6.78 7% 8.24 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 8.53 Splatting 10.8 8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.25% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98 9,315 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 571 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 253 (A2) Unknown 100 100 110 (AA) Unknown 100 100 222 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 524309 (AE) Unknown 100 100 22 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 22 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 269 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 799 (F2) Unknown 100 100 517	39.5% Below average	Read 259 Write 190 Mixed 219 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 7.68 39% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 26.4 50% 99.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 335GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 155 1808 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7054 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2829 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1434 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 122 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 166 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 111 111 269217 (C2) HDA temperature 119 91 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	40.7% Average	Read 70.5 Write 71.2 Mixed 67 52% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.34 82% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.6% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 14.2 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 58.6 68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G53JW Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G53JW

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	31x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	38x

SSD
ARC 100 240GBOCZ $120Bench 87%, 11,799 samples	4x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
120GB 120GBTeamBench 90%, 60 samples	2x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GBUnknownBench 37%, 5 samples	4x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 4x2GBAsintBench 40%, 37 samples	3x
SSZ3128M8-EDJED 2x2GBAsintBench 24%, 452 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16