Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100824
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '18 at 02:30
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 165 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 412 44% 349 Pts	64-Core 410 25% 410 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Nvidia(10DE 087E) 1.2GB CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	21.2% Poor	Lighting 25.1 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 28 20% 30.3 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 20.4 Splatting 25.6 23% 28.3 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 147 100 147 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 238 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 30 (A9) Unknown 100 100 24 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 20 (AE) Unknown 100 100 45 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 100 176093659164 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2088 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1540 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1875	11.1% Very poor	Read 43 Write 72.3 Mixed 60.9 13% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.17 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 1.09 10% 4.93 MB/s	DQ Read 7.1 DQ Write 92.5 DQ Mixed 5.76 18% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 78%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4.5TB free Firmware: 9401 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 27.2 Mixed 26 20% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 3.21 4K Mixed 0.66 179% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 171 1200 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2600 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8681 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2423 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 133 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 193 193 22547 (C2) HDA temperature 132 111 18 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.2% Above average	Read 94.9 Write 94.2 Mixed 58.3 61% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 0.45 4K Mixed 0.09 32% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 11.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	80x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	58x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	18x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	9x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	75x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	44x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16