User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170912
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '18 at 02:26
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 594
62% 495 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 6755) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 3.22
3% 6.01 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 6.43
4% 4.68 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,744
Write 1,128
Mixed 1,253
304% 1,375 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 16.1
96% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.1
DQ Write 36.4
DQ Mixed 15.4
17% 28 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 168%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HDZ-2G3B1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 24.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback