| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
CPU throttled at 5% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H97M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150727 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 17 '18 at 20:52 |
| Run Duration | 94 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
| CPU Throttled | 5% |
PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
|
34%
Below average
|
28% 41.3 Pts
|
12% 102 Pts
|
8% 125 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.6%
Below average
|
31% 48.7 fps
|
46% 56 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
89.2%
Excellent
|
98% 438 MB/s
|
122% 39.5 MB/s
|
77% 130 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
43.2%
Average
|
49% 17 GB/s
|
17% 6.07 GB/s
|
27% 147 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,134 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 179x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 155x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 153x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 109x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 77x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 65x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $674 |