Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory	1.5 GB free of 3.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080409
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '18 at 13:05
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B 205 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	21.7% Poor	SC Int 52.8 SC Float 38 SC Mixed 44.7 36% 45.2 Pts	QC Int 105 QC Float 75.3 QC Mixed 88.7 20% 89.8 Pts	MC Int 104 MC Float 76.8 MC Mixed 89.3 14% 90.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 22%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics 508 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 3029) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.910.0.0 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 0.8 0% 1.57 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 2 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$19 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.03E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1062 (03) Spinup time 137 135 4125 (04) Start/Stop count 77 77 23625 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 19913 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 77 77 23521 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 1 1061 (BC) Unknown 100 98 34 (BE) vendor-specific 65 42 35 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 390 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 193 193 23625 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 45 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	46.6% Average	Read 84 Write 78.2 Mixed 79.2 61% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.37 96% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA TransMemory-Ex2 64GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 12GB free, PID 1407 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.71% Terrible	Read 27.6 Write 22.6 Mixed 19.4 29% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.15 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.22 19% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.71% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 36GB 796 User benchmarks, average bench 19% null MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	14% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

CPU
Athlon Dual Core 5200BAMDBench 20%, 128 samples	50x
Athlon Dual Core 4450BAMD $21Bench 17%, 195 samples	42x
Athlon Dual Core 5000BAMDBench 20%, 205 samples	35x

GPU
Radeon 3100 GraphicsATIBench 0%, 508 samples	143x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 23,136 samples	13x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 21,718 samples	7x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $40Bench 58%, 30,490 samples	7x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $94Bench 98%, 23,024 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $25Bench 60%, 14,093 samples	4x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $145	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $155	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11