Asrock Z370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 152%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 13:03
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700K-$320
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
125% Outstanding
SC Int 154
SC Float 160
SC Mixed 152
124% 155 Pts
QC Int 606
QC Float 637
QC Mixed 625
141% 622 Pts
MC Int 1,087
MC Float 1,322
MC Mixed 1183
179% 1,198 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2082 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Lighting 242
Reflection 214
Parallax 230
74% 229 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 224
Splatting 178
80% 186 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$260
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,489
Write 1,926
Mixed 1,835
463% 2,083 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 41.1
217% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 55.1
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 41.3
87% 166 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 292%
Great: 353%
WD Green 240GB (2018)
223GB free
Firmware: UF300000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 361
Write 185
Mixed 191
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 3.59
44% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 43
DQ Mixed 3.98
21% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 52%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$44
893GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 163
Mixed 162
123% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.41
4K Write 2.83
4K Mixed 0.35
150% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$189
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 26.3
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 31.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 47.8
84% 47.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 99%
Great: 108%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z370 Taichi Builds (Compare 1,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Taichi - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $1,614
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $162
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $74G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback