User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemEXPER ULTRANOTE
MotherboardCLEVO W55xEU
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 12:37
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron 1000M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
21.7% Poor
SC Int 45.4
SC Float 47.9
SC Mixed 47
37% 46.8 Pts
QC Int 88.1
QC Float 88.4
QC Mixed 86.5
20% 87.7 Pts
MC Int 84.9
MC Float 87.7
MC Mixed 73.4
12% 82 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 24%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0550) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4
1% 4.37 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 3
Splatting 7.4
2% 5.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 55.9
Mixed 72.8
49% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.22
48% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 859B CT25664BF160B.C8FE 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.5% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $136
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback