Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L750 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '18 at 12:31
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 20,487 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	SC Int 12 SC Float 12.8 SC Mixed 44 18% 22.9 Pts	QC Int 156 QC Float 136 QC Mixed 129 32% 140 Pts	MC Int 64.7 MC Float 172 MC Mixed 222 22% 153 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M 3,271 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.19 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	2.79% Terrible	Lighting 8.8 Reflection 8.8 Parallax 2.8 2% 6.8 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 9 Splatting 4.8 3% 7.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.79% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 17,933 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 9 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4348 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3914 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 95 95 164 (AE) Unknown 100 100 444 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 47 227634118696 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 95 95 5 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 35437343802 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1114055658 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1569608698	62.3% Good	Read 494 Write 322 Mixed 386 89% 401 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 26.5 4K Mixed 15.5 66% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 92.1 DQ Write 39 DQ Mixed 44.4 38% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 9905469-154.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.9% Poor	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 11.2 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 1 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

GPU
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,271 samples	338x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,929 samples	103x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 66,251 samples	81x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 4,530 samples	157x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,842 samples	53x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 3,402 samples	31x

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $321

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $945	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58	HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12