Asus T100TAF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 4%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus T100TAF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T100TAF
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160714
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 11:34
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3735G
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Memory 22.9
1-Core 14.1
2-Core 28.9
14% 22 Pts
4-Core 58.2
8-Core 58.1
8% 58.2 Pts
64-Core 54.7
3% 54.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 182D) 508MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.81
Parallax 0.78
0% 0.75 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 0.96
1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.11
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.5% Very poor
Read 160
Write 32.7
Mixed 59.9
18% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 3.24
4K Mixed 2.26
25% 6.41 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 1.2
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.3
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.23 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback