Asus T100TAF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemAsus T100TAF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T100TAF
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160714
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 11:34
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom Z3735G
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
SC Int 25.8
SC Float 14.1
SC Mixed 18.7
16% 19.5 Pts
QC Int 98.8
QC Float 58.2
QC Mixed 68.9
17% 75.3 Pts
MC Int 91.2
MC Float 54.7
MC Mixed 67.9
11% 71.3 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 16%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 182D) 508MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 2.5
1% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.2
1% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.11
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 160
Write 32.7
Mixed 59.9
18% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 3.24
4K Mixed 2.26
25% 6.41 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
6.44% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 1.2
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.3
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.23 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical T100TAF Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus T100TAF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $145Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $249AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $150SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $899SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback