PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 1.33%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
Graphics | 3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | ECS 945GCT-M2 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20070917 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 17 '18 at 10:58 |
Run Duration | 40932 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Single core | Quad core | Multi core |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Celeron D 3.20GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
|
1.33%
Terrible
|
1% 1.4 Pts
|
2% 7.17 Pts
|
1% 8.2 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
3.93%
Terrible
|
3% 9.67 fps
|
5% 10.8 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
27.2%
Poor
|
28% 38.6 MB/s
|
29% 0.23 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
|
1.79%
Terrible
|
2% 0.63 GB/s
|
0% 0.13 GB/s
|
4% 993 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $19Bench 24%, 23,449 samples | 8x |
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $25Bench 15%, 3,127 samples | 4x |
Pentium Dual E2180Intel $120Bench 13%, 2,312 samples | 4x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 22,496 samples | 5x |
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 6,846 samples | 4x |
GeForce 7300 SENvidiaBench 0%, 850 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $77 |