Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171221
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '18 at 05:45
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$878 3,250 User benchmarks, average bench 108% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	SC Int 104 SC Float 108 SC Mixed 107 85% 106 Pts	QC Int 402 QC Float 408 QC Mixed 404 92% 405 Pts	MC Int 2,016 MC Float 1,879 MC Mixed 1953 293% 1,949 Pts
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 119%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$799 121,501 User benchmarks, average bench 155% EVGA(3842 6390) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (141 fps cap detected)	52.5% Above average	Lighting 142 Reflection 142 Parallax 141 44% 142 fps	MRender 141 Gravity 141 Splatting 138 59% 140 fps
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 178%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$238 20,584 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 230GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 24148 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 857 (B1) Unknown 96 96 231 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 9 (BE) vendor-specific 69 52 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 199 199 9 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 6 (EB) Unknown 99 99 176 (F1) Unknown 99 99 71558816354	102% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 476 Mixed 505 112% 500 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 38.8 141% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 90.7 94% 154 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 122%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$90 81,041 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 306GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 22 (03) Spinup time 174 170 4275 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7110 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 14 14 62829 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1667 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 447 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6662 (C2) HDA temperature 117 91 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 155 1	59.2% Above average	Read 115 Write 90.7 Mixed 99.7 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.36 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 78%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$125 13,083 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 152GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8875 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6195 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31574 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 945 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 252 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5942 (C2) HDA temperature 119 91 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	46% Average	Read 84.7 Write 75 Mixed 82.4 61% 80.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.51 141% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$200 12,773 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 132%

UFO

Desktop 138%

UFO

Workstation 156%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $878Bench 108%, 3,250 samples	987x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $700Bench 100%, 423 samples	84x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $448Bench 96%, 509 samples	78x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $799Bench 155%, 121,501 samples	560x
GTX 1080Nvidia $538Bench 127%, 208,140 samples	151x
GTX 1070Nvidia $447Bench 100%, 265,250 samples	49x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $325Bench 259%, 19,273 samples	215x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $200Bench 234%, 49,076 samples	155x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $590Bench 264%, 5,137 samples	146x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 96%, 2,513 samples	67x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 698 samples	65x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 388 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $2,002

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330	Nvidia GTX 1070 $447	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $310	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $290	AMD RX 480 $350	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $36	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12