Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171221
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '18 at 05:45
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$700 4,980 User benchmarks, average bench 108% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	SC Int 104 SC Float 108 SC Mixed 107 85% 106 Pts	QC Int 402 QC Float 408 QC Mixed 404 92% 405 Pts	MC Int 2,016 MC Float 1,879 MC Mixed 1953 293% 1,949 Pts
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 118%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$730 150,527 User benchmarks, average bench 154% EVGA(3842 6390) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (141 fps cap detected)	52.5% Above average	Lighting 142 Reflection 142 Parallax 141 44% 142 fps	MRender 141 Gravity 141 Splatting 138 59% 140 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 177%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$238 23,374 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 230GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 24148 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 857 (B1) Unknown 96 96 231 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 9 (BE) vendor-specific 69 52 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 199 199 9 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 6 (EB) Unknown 99 99 176 (F1) Unknown 99 99 71558816354	102% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 476 Mixed 505 112% 500 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 38.8 141% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 90.7 94% 154 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 128%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70 87,479 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 306GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 22 (03) Spinup time 174 170 4275 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7110 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 14 14 62829 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1667 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 447 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6662 (C2) HDA temperature 117 91 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 155 1	59.2% Above average	Read 115 Write 90.7 Mixed 99.7 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.36 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$90 16,684 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 152GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8875 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6195 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31574 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 945 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 252 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5942 (C2) HDA temperature 119 91 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	46% Average	Read 84.7 Write 75 Mixed 82.4 61% 80.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.51 141% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$211 18,826 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 133%

UFO

Desktop 146%

UFO

Workstation 160%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $382

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $700Bench 108%, 4,980 samples	1,263x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $650Bench 100%, 607 samples	125x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $325Bench 95%, 749 samples	104x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $730Bench 154%, 150,527 samples	710x
GTX 1080Nvidia $478Bench 125%, 246,845 samples	191x
RX Vega 64AMD $585Bench 115%, 3,734 samples	63x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $215Bench 290%, 23,239 samples	264x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $170Bench 220%, 52,653 samples	189x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $466Bench 270%, 5,956 samples	175x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 96%, 3,789 samples	93x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 108%, 867 samples	83x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 134%, 93 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 111% - Outstanding

Total price: $2,027

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320	Nvidia GTX 1070 $413	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $300	AMD RX 480 $280	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $945	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58	HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12