| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 19.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P5KPL/1600 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090316 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 17 '18 at 05:17 |
| Run Duration | 87 Seconds |
| Run User | VNM-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Single core | Quad core | Multi core |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.8%
Average
|
48% 60.6 Pts
|
55% 240 Pts
|
37% 244 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 8A9C) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
18% 52 fps
|
21% 48.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
160g 160GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0AG.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
65.3%
Good
|
77% 103 MB/s
|
47% 0.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
17% 5.9 GB/s
|
17% 5.8 GB/s
|
42% 95.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical P5KPL/1600 Builds (Compare 380 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5KPL/1600
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $154Bench 27%, 29,759 samples | 54x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $30Bench 24%, 27,210 samples | 44x |
| Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 29%, 8,108 samples | 42x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 11,181 samples | 34x |
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 5%, 9,683 samples | 19x |
| GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,948 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $240 |