| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HG4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20161028 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 17 '18 at 02:06 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | CHL-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.1%
Very good
|
78% 132 Pts
|
40% 292 Pts
|
18% 298 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4
|
23.3%
Poor
|
22% 30.8 fps
|
26% 30.7 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
38.1%
Below average
|
36% 12.4 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
64% 62.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HG4 Builds (Compare 385 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HG4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 121x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 64x |
| Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 36x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 59x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 42x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |