Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110211
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '18 at 22:18
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 119 2-Core 236 86% 150 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 451 59% 444 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 74.4 Reflection 73 Parallax 71.7 61% 73 fps	MRender 76 Gravity 67 Splatting 57.2 54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 20413 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 97 (B1) Unknown 95 95 94 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 47 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 49 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29161814423	112% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 419 Mixed 419 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 93.3 4K Mixed 47.5 176% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 116 129% 221 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 47GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 190 3425 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11194 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 28 28 52746 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1666 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 133 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 41 41 478008 (C2) HDA temperature 112 99 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 190 190 830 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 194 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 146 0	34.2% Below average	Read 66.8 Write 52.1 Mixed 59.7 45% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.35 91% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 9GB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 212685568 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7394 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 31577641 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 20354 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 96 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 71 56 521404445 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 70 70 60464 (C2) HDA temperature 29 44 47244640285 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -85255100821170 (F1) Unknown 100 253 20132091319 (F2) Unknown 100 253 285415697384	64.2% Good	Read 123 Write 101 Mixed 113 85% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.16 71% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 4,223 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 19.1 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 19.8 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 53.7 74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	88x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	75x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	31x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	10x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x

RAM
DDR3 1600G 2x4GBUnknownBench 51%, 1,144 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16