Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 REV 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110608
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '18 at 22:15
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
Intel Core i7-2600-$281 52,285 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	66.4% Good	SC Int 94.4 SC Float 94.7 SC Mixed 94.7 76% 94.6 Pts	QC Int 319 QC Float 319 QC Mixed 326 73% 321 Pts	MC Int 453 MC Float 468 MC Mixed 465 69% 462 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti-$152 16,860 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 842A) 1GB CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 52.8 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 68.8 18% 54.5 fps	MRender 45.8 Gravity 64.3 Splatting 34.9 21% 48.3 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$105 229,101 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 343GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3137 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1001 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 58 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 14 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5818241044	61.3% Good	Read 266 Write 212 Mixed 217 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 33.1 96% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 78.4 80% 132 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$92 52,445 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 513GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 70 68 9179 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8134 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3999 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2703 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 39 261993857069 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 18 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 8180	68.4% Good	Read 104 Write 135 Mixed 118 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.53 134% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 77%
Samsung HD401LJ 400GB 705 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 237GB free Firmware: ZZ10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7744 (04) Start/Stop count 80 80 20901 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 27431 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5771 (BE) vendor-specific 55 44 45 (C2) HDA temperature 103 70 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 118100 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	36.7% Below average	Read 63.3 Write 64.1 Mixed 56.1 46% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.49 109% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905458-026.A00LF 2x4GB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 71%, 59,589 samples	407x
Core i7-2600KIntel $375Bench 69%, 56,788 samples	219x
Core i7-2600Intel $281Bench 63%, 52,285 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $330Bench 64%, 330,096 samples	126x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $260Bench 71%, 335,077 samples	85x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 40%, 167,329 samples	52x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $87Bench 105%, 297,917 samples	97x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $105Bench 111%, 229,101 samples	57x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $207Bench 94%, 66,732 samples	23x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 30,921 samples	53x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 18,634 samples	23x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 12,706 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $663

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360	Nvidia GTX 1070 $344	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $145	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $249	AMD RX 480 $280	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $150	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $899	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11