Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 21:27
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 234
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 898
80% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,259
78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 31
Parallax 36
32% 35.3 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 35.5
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,286
Write 1,435
Mixed 1,305
370% 1,675 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 47.8
172% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 95
96% 159 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 241%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
142GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 411
Mixed 420
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 43.7
158% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 89.3
98% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
764GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 140
Write 132
Mixed 130
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.26
112% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
641GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 133
Write 159
Mixed 158
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.33
114% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $293
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback