Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 136%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 24 days ago, 23 days ago, 21 days ago, 20 days ago, 18 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 3 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 4 hrs ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory45.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 19:17
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$889
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
119% Outstanding
SC Int 115
SC Float 123
SC Mixed 119
95% 119 Pts
QC Int 456
QC Float 493
QC Mixed 474
108% 475 Pts
MC Int 2,583
MC Float 2,708
MC Mixed 2,684
398% 2,658 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$538
Gigabyte(1458 3774) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2554 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 426
Reflection 415
Parallax 457
135% 433 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 416
Splatting 274
137% 314 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 136%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW010X6 1TB
760GB free
Firmware: LSF042C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 455
Mixed 449
105% 471 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 38.6
129% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 57.8
77% 141 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$420
388GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,040
Write 1,492
Mixed 1,240
352% 1,591 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 39.3
177% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 25.3
76% 168 MB/s
Poor: 193%
This bench: 236%
Great: 281%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CMK32GX4M4C3000C15 CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 CMK32GX4M4C3000C15 CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 CMK32GX4M4C3000C15 CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 CMK32GX4M4C3000C15 CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 24.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 75%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 131%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,888
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $300Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $158
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback