Asrock H87 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '18 at 19:15
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$62 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 200 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 387 52% 387 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3413) CLim: 1390 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Lighting 77.2 Reflection 71.7 Parallax 88.7 63% 79.2 fps	MRender 74.1 Gravity 70.8 Splatting 60.9 55% 68.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103 6,500 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 106 13407650 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 -51943334468331 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2518 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 377 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 50 42952949793 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13407650 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13407650 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13407650 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 21387 (EA) Unknown 0 0 23485 (F1) Unknown 0 0 23485 (F2) Unknown 0 0 15658	65.1% Good	Read 492 Write 141 Mixed 211 61% 281 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 15.3 116% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.9 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 44.9 45% 69 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 82%
Toshiba E300 3TB-$116 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 789GB free Firmware: MZ6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 145 145 77 (03) Spinup time 134 134 30091379097 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 694 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1543 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 358 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 694 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 694 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 188979544101 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.9% Good	Read 120 Write 120 Mixed 131 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.18 85% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 87%
Hds72505 HDS725050KLA360 500GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 432GB free Firmware: K2AO Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 107 107 42992730758 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7927 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 19385 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5686 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 8202 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 8202 (C2) HDA temperature 122 122 240518758445 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 1	34.5% Below average	Read 60 Write 59.7 Mixed 62.2 46% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.35 101% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 12GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 17.4 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 17.5 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87 Pro4 Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Pro4 - $113

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	90x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	49x
Xeon E3-1230 v3Intel $217Bench 73%, 8,137 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	37x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	34x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	19x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	29x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16