Acer Aspire one

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire one  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire one
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090312
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 18:34
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
22.1% Poor
Memory 42.8
1-Core 6.8
2-Core 11.1
17% 20.2 Pts
4-Core 11.1
8-Core 11.2
2% 11.1 Pts
64-Core 11
1% 11 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B256-HP 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V182 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30% Poor
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 131
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 14.9
49% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 46.4
DQ Write 35.1
DQ Mixed 16.9
19% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 30%
Great: 102%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
8GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Read 9.54
Write 5.32
Mixed 4.78
8% 6.54 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.003
4% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.59% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback