Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 143%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
5 days ago, 5 days ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171003
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 18:33
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$878
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
113% Outstanding
SC Int 107
SC Float 116
SC Mixed 112
89% 112 Pts
QC Int 431
QC Float 466
QC Mixed 447
102% 448 Pts
MC Int 2,465
MC Float 2,546
MC Mixed 2,545
377% 2,518 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 113%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$799
MSI(1462 3607) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 512
Reflection 509
Parallax 638
173% 553 fps
MRender 259
Gravity 538
Splatting 281
160% 359 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 165%
Great: 178%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$137
371GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 115%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$200
337GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
4KALIGNED
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,813
Write 1,447
Mixed 1,431
417% 1,897 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 21.9
128% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 41.5
DQ Write 68.6
DQ Mixed 20.1
25% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 241%
Great: 277%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$200
307GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
4KALIGNED
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,809
Write 1,448
Mixed 1,466
419% 1,908 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 21.7
129% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 42.2
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 46.4
43% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 242%
Great: 277%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$78
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 171
Mixed 174
134% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.23
110% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$82
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 141
Mixed 136
113% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.16
85% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$82
15GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 90.2
Mixed 84.3
68% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.26
107% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54%
Great: 99%
WD 10EACS External 1TB
95GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 37.2
Mixed 8.46
32% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.37
96% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$204
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 31.4
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 21.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 132%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,877
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $310Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback