Fujitsu CELSIUS W370

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W370 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2817-A1
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1152 x 864 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '18 at 17:12
Run Duration	368 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	44% Average	Memory 73.9 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 85.3 44% 67.2 Pts	4-Core 85.2 8-Core 84.2 11% 84.7 Pts	64-Core 86.3 5% 86.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-PRO 190 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E410) 512MB Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 1 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 3.09 2% 2.05 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB 8,287 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 205GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 157 154 3150 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 229 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 223 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 229 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 84 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 229 (C2) HDA temperature 110 106 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.2% Below average	Read 63.7 Write 65.7 Mixed 40 42% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.28 81% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 43%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.AAA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 277 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 12050701 (09) Power-on hours count 27 27 64729 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 277 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 58 705429541 (C2) HDA temperature 37 42 51539607589 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 73 51 189248049 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	44.3% Average	Read 75.1 Write 79.5 Mixed 24.7 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.39 82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 54%
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB 2,425 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 100GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 196 0 (03) Spinup time 168 158 4141 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7366 (05) Reallocated sector count 154 154 735 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25548 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7280 (C2) HDA temperature 117 93 33 (C4) Reallocation count 103 103 97 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	24.9% Poor	Read 46.3 Write 40 Mixed 36.4 31% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.34 87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 32%
Intenso Twister Line 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 800f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.21% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 4.65 Mixed 6.69 10% 8.97 MB/s	4K Read 3.79 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 15% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.21% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W370 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W370

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	10x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	3x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	8x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	3x
GeForce 405NvidiaBench 1%, 1,861 samples	2x

SSD
SSDPR-CL100-120-G3 120GBBench 63%, 1,092 samples	3x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	11x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	7x
7GBUnknownBench 24%, 8,824 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16