Hp-pavilion NC695AA-ABA m9515y

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion NC695AA-ABA m9515y (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Aspen
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '16 at 15:35
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9850 2,080 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 35.6 2-Core 63.9 39% 57.2 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 116 15% 115 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3753) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6191 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Lighting 24.2 Reflection 17.9 Parallax 23.1 20% 21.7 fps	MRender 26 Gravity 20 Splatting 18.6 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 11253117 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -60026462928376 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 504 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 97 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 76 73019424796 (C2) HDA temperature 28 76 73019424796 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11253117 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11253117 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11253117 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3521 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3950 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3950 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2980	36.8% Below average	Read 166 Write 135 Mixed 150 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 11.3 62% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 80.1 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 11.5 28% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS721075KLA330 750GB-$100 3,905 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 405GB free Firmware: GK8O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 100 151 (03) Spinup time 123 100 38688391625 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2822 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 100 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2363 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2308 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2822 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2822 (C2) HDA temperature 176 122 210454249506 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	43.4% Average	Read 74.4 Write 76.8 Mixed 82.3 59% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 47%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB 3,704 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 461GB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	7.53% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 18.7 Mixed 18.6 24% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 0.17 4K Mixed 0.21 15% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.53% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 9 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion NC695AA-ABA m9515y

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)