| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock G965M-S (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090512 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 16 '18 at 01:23 |
| Run Duration | 510 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.7%
Below average
|
35% 50.5 Pts
|
7% 55.1 Pts
|
3% 55.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel G965 Express Chipset Family
ASRock(1849 29A2) 384MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1912
|
0.2%
Terrible
|
0% 0.29 fps
| ||
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
|
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: GG2OAH10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
30.5%
Below average
|
28% 38.8 MB/s
|
51% 0.49 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
27.3%
Poor
|
30% 40.7 MB/s
|
115% 1.02 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DT microDuo 8GB
7GB free, PID 16a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
14% 21.8 MB/s
| |||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.6%
Very poor
|
13% 4.4 GB/s
|
11% 3.83 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G965M-S Builds (Compare 15 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock G965M-S
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| G965 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 13 samples | 4x |
| GeForce GT 440NvidiaBench 4%, 14,286 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $50 |