Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 00:50
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 179
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 602
58% 480 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.9% Below average
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 58.3
Parallax 83.7
30% 59.6 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 75.2
53% 63.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 402
Mixed 414
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 31.6
133% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 105
124% 218 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 134%
Nvme PLEXTOR PX-512M8 512GB
48GB free
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 749
Write 686
Mixed 722
161% 719 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.9
176% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 147
147% 237 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 139%
Great: 248%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
4.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
309GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 107
Write 62.3
Mixed 88.5
65% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.13
60% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS72107 750GB
7GB free
Firmware: A87A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 53.5
Mixed 57.9
45% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.31
67% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSA.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 42.3
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 19.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 125% - Outstanding Total price: $254
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback