Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '18 at 19:57
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-2600K-$375
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
69.4% Good
SC Int 101
SC Float 101
SC Mixed 101
81% 101 Pts
QC Int 319
QC Float 337
QC Mixed 335
75% 330 Pts
MC Int 498
MC Float 513
MC Mixed 508
76% 506 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8466) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 148
Reflection 115
Parallax 160
47% 141 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 190
Splatting 108
63% 143 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 70%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$289
235GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 478
Mixed 494
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 24.3
107% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 89.4
105% 184 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 117%
Crucial M500 240GB-$80
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.2% Good
Read 268
Write 246
Mixed 259
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 24.9
86% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 52.3
73% 135 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 91%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
902GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 25.6
Mixed 27.7
36% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.16
4K Write 0.45
4K Mixed 0.32
31% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 50%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$52
6GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.99% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 17.7
Mixed 19.7
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.73
4K Write 0.22
4K Mixed 0.1
40% 2.68 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.99%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $866
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $136
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback