Asus P5KC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5KC  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '18 at 11:32
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 93.6
48% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 175
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E224) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 45.1
29% 37.8 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 36.7
26% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+ Series 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGYA0201 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 194
Write 144
Mixed 181
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 7.27
46% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 12.8
DQ Mixed 7.88
8% 11.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
9GB free
Firmware: 4.CCB Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49% Average
Read 88.7
Write 82.2
Mixed 69.7
60% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.25
71% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49%
Great: 54%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
6GB free
Firmware: CR100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 69
Write 69
Mixed 75.6
54% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.35
91% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 44%
Maxtor 6B200M0 204GB-$81
4GB free
Firmware: BANC1B70 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 53.9
Mixed 49
38% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 3.43
4K Mixed 0.3
119% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 35%
MD07500- AQDW-RO 750GB
7GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 25
Mixed 27.5
35% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.28
55% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 21%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-60U6AA0 500GB
7GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 25.3
Mixed 28
36% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.27
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 48%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00A7B0 500GB
8GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 25.8
Mixed 28.1
36% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.32
93% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback