Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170901
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '18 at 17:57
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 90.2 1-Core 120 2-Core 241 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 890 82% 685 Pts	64-Core 1334 83% 1334 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781 8,241 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AMD(1002 0B36) CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.3 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Lighting 81.2 Reflection 56.2 Parallax 119 66% 85.3 fps	MRender 52.2 Gravity 86.5 Splatting 71.7 58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 841GB free Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1431 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 368 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 150 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 52 206159216671 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 8406864305 (F7) Unknown 100 100 262856385 (F8) Unknown 100 100 129678091 (B4) Unknown 0 0 9189 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	62.2% Good	Read 483 Write 189 Mixed 165 61% 279 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 13.3 79% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 23.4 61% 130 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 99%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 23294 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4104 (B1) Unknown 86 86 139 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 49 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1740 (F1) Unknown 99 99 62778736097	67.4% Good	Read 513 Write 157 Mixed 154 60% 275 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 13.4 98% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 32.6 72% 149 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C15 2x8GB 6,416 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	130% Outstanding	MC Read 50.6 MC Write 50.1 MC Mixed 43.9 138% 48.2 GB/s	SC Read 26 SC Write 47 SC Mixed 31 99% 34.7 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)