Unknow Unknow

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemUnknow Unknow  (all builds)
Motherboard RS780-SB700
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '18 at 17:42
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 96.9
47% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 196
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.15
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.93 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0627A0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.3% Below average
Read 232
Write 210
Mixed 189
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 5.81
43% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 19.8
DQ Mixed 8.17
10% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HCP725050GLAT80 500GB
429GB free
Firmware: GM4OA4CA Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 100
Mixed 90.3
68% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 3.53
4K Mixed 0.37
126% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HCP725050GLAT80 500GB
429GB free
Firmware: GM4OA4CA Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 80.6
Write 100
Mixed 73.6
64% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 3.28
4K Mixed 0.34
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99
116GB free
Firmware: FB2OC40C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 50.9
Mixed 30.8
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.26
64% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Unknow Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Unknow Unknow

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback