Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '18 at 12:52
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
SC Int 120
SC Float 124
SC Mixed 119
97% 121 Pts
QC Int 499
QC Float 486
QC Mixed 478
111% 488 Pts
MC Int 884
MC Float 976
MC Mixed 983
142% 948 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$344
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 142
Reflection 143
Parallax 143
44% 143 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 140
Splatting 143
59% 142 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 110%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$207
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 502
Write 346
Mixed 356
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 22.1
101% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 81.8
104% 188 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 115%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$207
73GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 504
Write 336
Mixed 356
88% 399 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 22.7
103% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 81.3
116% 219 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 115%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$89
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 159
Write 137
Mixed 146
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.19
65% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 99%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
360GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 87.7
Mixed 80
68% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.21
72% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$196
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 35
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 127%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,572
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $340Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $145Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i5-8600K $249AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $150SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $899SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback