Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 days ago, 6 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '18 at 12:52
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$350
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
SC Int 120
SC Float 124
SC Mixed 119
97% 121 Pts
QC Int 499
QC Float 486
QC Mixed 478
111% 488 Pts
MC Int 884
MC Float 976
MC Mixed 983
142% 948 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$447
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 142
Reflection 143
Parallax 143
44% 143 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 140
Splatting 143
59% 142 fps
Poor: 84%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 110%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$158
85GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 502
Write 346
Mixed 356
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 22.1
101% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 81.8
104% 188 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 95%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$158
73GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 504
Write 336
Mixed 356
88% 399 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 22.7
103% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 81.3
116% 219 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 95%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$89
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5900 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 159
Write 137
Mixed 146
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.19
65% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 95%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$86
360GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 87.7
Mixed 80
68% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.21
72% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$205
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 35
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 124%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,506
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $325Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $135
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback