| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M4A88TD-M EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100617 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 13 '18 at 03:48 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.3%
Above average
|
48% 71.2 Pts
|
26% 208 Pts
|
15% 249 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 5830
Sapphire(174B E140) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
16% 17.4 fps
|
12% 14.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
47%
Average
|
49% 66.4 MB/s
|
121% 1.18 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Portable 250GB
75GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
31% 25.4 MB/s
|
59% 0.75 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
34.6%
Below average
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
22% 7.67 GB/s
|
58% 69.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A88TD-M EVO Builds (Compare 54 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-M EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 11x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 9x |
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $245 |