Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3160 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	27.6% Poor	Memory 48.4 1-Core 5 2-Core 18 19% 23.8 Pts	4-Core 41.5 8-Core 42 6% 41.8 Pts	64-Core 38.9 2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 2.56 1% 2.25 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-000MV 256GB 2,854 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT41M0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 135 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 20 (B1) Unknown 100 99 100 (B3) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 45 20 55 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 475677965 (F2) Unknown 99 99 1755374590	50.4% Above average	Read 472 Write 254 Mixed 339 78% 355 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 6.95 54% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 20.5 DQ Mixed 19 14% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GB 7,765 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16