Sony VPCEB4B4E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Sony VPCEB4B4E (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110128
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '18 at 14:49
Run Duration	344 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 480 16,023 User benchmarks, average bench 41% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 61.9 1-Core 66.5 2-Core 122 50% 83.5 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 149 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9071) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 0.94 1% 1.06 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSXN 320GB 2,380 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH012H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1260 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3136 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 3088 (0A) Spinup retry count 162 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3136 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 324 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 63 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 52826 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 214749151265 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 36 (DE) Loaded hours 94 94 2707 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 325 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	37.9% Below average	Read 72.6 Write 59.3 Mixed 69.6 51% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.26 69% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 48%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 88GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.28% Terrible	Read 27.9 Write 22.3 Mixed 13.1 25% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.57 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.004 6% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.28% Great: 37%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	6.7% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 9.32 Mixed 6.8 14% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.48 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.008 21% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.7% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 9.5 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Sony VPCEB4B4E

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)