Biostar TP67B+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TP67B+  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120706
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 11 '18 at 10:37
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 168
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 279
33% 256 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.1.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 49.1
Reflection 33
Parallax 59.7
40% 47.3 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 46.8
Splatting 40.3
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 376
Write 283
Mixed 305
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 17.1
81% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 68.9
DQ Mixed 16.6
22% 39 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
36GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 62.5
Mixed 63.7
48% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.44
115% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 55%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
18GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 71.5
Write 96.3
Mixed 55.5
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.39
93% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $776
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback