To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 10 '18 at 23:06
Run Duration335 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 94
2-Core 187
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 534
55% 441 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 49.8
35% 43.8 fps
MRender 48.2
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 35.3
35% 44 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 411
Mixed 418
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 36.9
128% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 57.4
65% 112 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
274GB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 157
Mixed 150
121% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.18
79% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 104%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
181GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 93.8
Mixed 115
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.23
101% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
72GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 96.6
Write 80
Mixed 91.6
68% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.27
73% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 69%
Generic Mass-Storage 2GB
2GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 7.97
Mixed 7.5
11% 9.89 MB/s
4K Read 2.85
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
11% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9 RMR5040ED58E9 F3-17000CL11- F3-17000CL11- 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.3% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 26.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback