Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140605
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '18 at 19:55
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 132 58% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 374 36% 298 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Lighting 25.7 Reflection 26.6 Parallax 30.3 21% 27.5 fps	MRender 23.7 Gravity 20.2 Splatting 32.6 22% 25.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 480GB-$129 8,505 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 324GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0330AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 693 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2575 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 28 (A3) Unknown 100 100 628 (94) Unknown 100 100 163415 (95) Unknown 100 100 2228 (96) Unknown 100 100 2055 (97) Unknown 100 100 2208 (A4) Unknown 100 100 29700 (A5) Unknown 100 100 81 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 23 (A9) Unknown 100 100 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 134 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 45269696446499 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 247771 (F2) Unknown 100 100 346766 (F5) Unknown 100 100 350831 (F6) Unknown 100 100 653660 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	46.2% Average	Read 337 Write 200 Mixed 164 51% 234 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 10.7 65% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 30.6 DQ Write 45.5 DQ Mixed 11.9 16% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 462GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 138 138 21493711108 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 9158 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7639 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4247 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 9158 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 9158 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 206159478825 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	58.3% Above average	Read 97.5 Write 106 Mixed 4.89 50% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.19 77% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 16GB free Firmware: V54OA73A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 114 114 25790972238 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 20254 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 26630 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 10800 (C0) Power-off retract count 84 84 20388 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 20388 (C2) HDA temperature 133 133 231929282605 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	32.3% Below average	Read 60.3 Write 51.8 Mixed 14.3 31% 42.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.29 85% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-032.A00LF 2x4GB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 17 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 14.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	37x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	5x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
T25 31TBTeamBench 58%, 15 samples	3x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	4x
99U5403-159.A01LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 52%, 29 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $805

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16