Zoostorm 7200-5299A

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5299A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock Z170 Pro4S
Memory	18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160118
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '18 at 19:19
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 90.9 1-Core 121 2-Core 231 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 530 60% 470 Pts	64-Core 712 44% 712 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.1% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 112 Parallax 97.5 84% 104 fps	MRender 92.9 Gravity 99.4 Splatting 86.3 75% 92.9 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT256G1122 256GB 1,971 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 100 94 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 680 (A6) Unknown 100 100 157 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 208 (A9) Unknown 100 100 383 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 218 (AE) Unknown 100 100 19 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 100 214748364845 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1826 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 31933 (F1) Unknown 253 253 14554 (F2) Unknown 253 253 7613	72.3% Very good	Read 474 Write 319 Mixed 382 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 4.1 88% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 25.9 75% 158 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 84%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 143 143 30089150836 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 159 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1426 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 159 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 198 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 198 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 214749020192 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	97.3% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 164 Mixed 166 127% 168 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.39 148% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB 5,753 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 8.17 Mixed 12.4 19% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.09 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 1.07 107% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB 9,100 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.3% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 22.5 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 19.9 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5299A Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Zoostorm 7200-5299A

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GBKingstonBench 82%, 9,100 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Zoostorm 7200-5299A

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Zoostorm 7200-5299A

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)