ODM ODM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemODM ODM  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '18 at 18:25
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7250-$97
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 33.4
31% 40.4 Pts
4-Core 44.6
8-Core 41.1
6% 42.8 Pts
64-Core 46
3% 46 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600M GS
Elitegroup(1019 22D0) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 327.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.41
1% 1.34 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 52.4
Write 51.1
Mixed 43.2
37% 48.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
77% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback