HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 09 '18 at 16:22
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 95
2-Core 155
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 228
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV300S37A/120G 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1026A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 503
Write 129
Mixed 205
60% 279 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 26.2
92% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 55.4
67% 118 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
104GB free
Firmware: JE3OA60A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 41.9
Write 43.6
Mixed 45.6
33% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.24
4K Mixed 0.19
45% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback