Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602-4L/D16  (all builds)
Memory60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '18 at 15:10
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 174
58% 105 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 656
59% 496 Pts
64-Core 1,610
100% 1,610 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Lighting 85.1
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 80.7
69% 85.3 fps
MRender 88.2
Gravity 87.8
Splatting 92.8
74% 89.6 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 950GB
685GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 889
Write 842
Mixed 898
196% 876 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 13.9
62% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 26.9
DQ Mixed 11.6
12% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 107%
Great: 183%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 166
Mixed 167
130% 173 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.17
81% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 18.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.8
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EP2C602-4L/D16 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback