Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 09 '18 at 15:03
Run Duration443 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 212
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 556
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2835 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 203
Parallax 204
131% 189 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 187
Splatting 131
121% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 445
Mixed 469
106% 478 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 38.6
142% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35.3
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 137
93% 109 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 182
Mixed 161
121% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 116
Write 88.7
Mixed 58
65% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.68
4K Write 5.64
4K Mixed 0.39
343% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
960GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50% Average
Read 74.4
Write 99.6
Mixed 90.9
67% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.26
82% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
452GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 69.3
Write 62
Mixed 68
50% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.22
83% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 67%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
206GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 97.4
Mixed 125
82% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.23
82% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
173GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 155
Write 149
Mixed 156
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.16
92% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 107%
Synology iSCSI Storage 215GB
157GB free
Firmware: 3.1
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.65% Terrible
Read 2.44
Write 29.9
Mixed 4.84
9% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 2.94
4K Mixed 1.47
269% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.65%
Great: 53%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
83GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 139
Write 120
Mixed 103
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 107%
SABRENT ASM1351 256GB
55GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
233% Outstanding
Read 349
Write 278
Mixed 272
372% 300 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 14.2
1,858% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 42
DQ Mixed 14.8
2,013% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 233%
Great: 251%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
20GB free, PID a83a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 24.7
Mixed 36.4
41% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.72
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 23.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 21.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback