NZXT N7 Z370

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	NZXT N7 Z370 (all builds)
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171207
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '18 at 12:30
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 83.1 1-Core 135 2-Core 268 89% 162 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 851 84% 688 Pts	64-Core 1,118 69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 190 Parallax 169 134% 174 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 165 Splatting 119 109% 135 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 743GB free Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	320% Outstanding	Read 2,714 Write 1,879 Mixed 1,902 480% 2,165 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 70.9 242% 87.8 MB/s	DQ Read 539 DQ Write 428 DQ Mixed 231 242% 399 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 320% Great: 354%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 569GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3070 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1131 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 42 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 64 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10522130278	99.7% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 399 Mixed 416 98% 443 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 89.4 4K Mixed 30.5 145% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 158 146% 227 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 135%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 501GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6797 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 704 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 53 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 60 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5496954901	112% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 480 Mixed 498 111% 498 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 46.2 157% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 155 156% 252 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 382GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8562 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4048 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 56 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3528 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2326583500	99.8% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 479 Mixed 493 108% 481 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 97.8 4K Mixed 27.7 130% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 89 121% 221 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 118%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 701GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	316% Outstanding	Read 2,686 Write 1,859 Mixed 1,810 469% 2,118 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 68.2 237% 85.9 MB/s	DQ Read 535 DQ Write 419 DQ Mixed 230 239% 395 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 316% Great: 363%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$226 1,110 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 100 (03) Spinup time 253 253 21488664858 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 341 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 272 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 126 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 846 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 846 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 163209674782 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	63.3% Good	Read 101 Write 118 Mixed 103 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 4.91 4K Mixed 1.32 270% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB 4,021 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.9% Very good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 22.9 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 22.7 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N7 Z370 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 101%

UFO

Motherboard: NZXT N7 Z370

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	162x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	34x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	30x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	29x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	21x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	21x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	20x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	18x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	26x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	12x
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $806

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16