Biostar B350GTN

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Biostar B350GTN (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '18 at 17:38
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 73.9 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 197 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 722 67% 558 Pts	64-Core 1,080 67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E2) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	119% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 181 Parallax 166 133% 170 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 157 Splatting 116 105% 130 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 9,737 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 927GB free (System drive) Firmware: AADA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	285% Outstanding	Read 2,556 Write 1,935 Mixed 2,234 499% 2,242 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 93.1 4K Mixed 50.5 173% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 26.3 77% 168 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 285% Great: 251%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 882GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 2 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11597 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 99 99 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 99 99 2 (B7) Unknown 99 99 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 36 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 6 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 56316209178	92.5% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 409 Mixed 424 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 29.1 128% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 91.9 97% 160 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 133%
WD WD80PUZX-64NEAY0 8TB 356 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4TB free Firmware: 80.H0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 112 (03) Spinup time 161 161 30094655847 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 259 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3305 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 259 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 377 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 377 (C2) HDA temperature 196 196 244814643233 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	96.2% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 181 Mixed 153 122% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.47 113% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 99%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 166 7516 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 671 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7152 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 663 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 297 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 181 181 59212 (C2) HDA temperature 115 101 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	85.8% Excellent	Read 155 Write 144 Mixed 107 101% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 0.25 106% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 11,954 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 42.9 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 32.1 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 26.7 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B350GTN Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Biostar B350GTN

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	2x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	2x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	2x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	2x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	1x

SSD
Premier SP550 240GBAdata $74Bench 79%, 29,295 samples	1x
SL500 256GBColorfulBench 65%, 1,071 samples	1x
SSD 120GBIntensoBench 65%, 3,562 samples	1x

RAM
2666 C15 Series 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 116 samples	1x
ValueSelect DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsairBench 41%, 3,434 samples	1x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsairBench 73%, 16,624 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16