Asus U32VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus U32VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK U32VM
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 08 '18 at 12:30
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 62.4
38% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 61.4
8-Core 62.8
8% 62.1 Pts
64-Core 61.9
4% 61.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 2137) 2.5GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 423
Write 194
Mixed 262
64% 293 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 9.36
55% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 9.73
14% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback