Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '18 at 15:40
Run Duration390 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$132
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 216
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 424
57% 426 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.9% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 42.6
38% 44.8 fps
MRender 53.2
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 41.7
38% 47.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 496
Write 360
Mixed 392
92% 416 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 23.9
132% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 41.7
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 73.9
77% 119 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
504GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 153
Write 139
Mixed 149
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.18
69% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
8GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 94
Write 95
Mixed 92.5
71% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.2
71% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 112%
ST750LM0 22 HN-M750MBB 750GB
28GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 47.6
Write 47.2
Mixed 43.2
59% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.3
31% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 2GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Read 12.3
Write 4.07
Mixed 5.26
8% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.16
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
24% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.1% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.9
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback